Jump to content

Federated Learning: Difference between revisions

From Edge Computing Wiki
mNo edit summary
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:


=== 1. Introduction ===
=== 1. Introduction ===
'''Federated Learning (FL)''' is an innovative distributed machine learning method allowing multiple devices to collaboratively train a shared model while keeping their data private and localized. It naturally integrates with '''Edge Computing (EC)''', where data is processed near its source, thus minimizing latency and enhancing privacy<ref>Abreha et al., 2022</ref>.
'''Federated Learning (FL)''' is a distributed machine learning technique where multiple edge devices collaboratively train a shared model while keeping their local data private. It naturally integrates with '''Edge Computing (EC)''', which processes data close to the source, reducing latency and enhancing privacy.<ref name="Abreha2022">Abreha, H.G., Hayajneh, M., & Serhani, M.A. (2022). Federated Learning in Edge Computing: A Systematic Survey. ''Sensors'', 22(2), 450.</ref>


=== 2. Fundamentals of Federated Learning at the Edge ===
=== 2. Fundamentals of Federated Learning at the Edge ===


==== How FL Works ====
==== How FL Works ====
Federated Learning operates through three key steps<ref>Abreha et al., 2022</ref>:
Federated Learning operates in three core stages:<ref name="Abreha2022"/>
# '''Task Initialization''': A server selects edge devices and distributes the global model.
# '''Local Training''': Devices train the model locally using their own data.
# '''Aggregation''': The server aggregates device models to update the global model.


# '''Task Initialization''': A central server selects devices and shares the initial global model.
This iterative process continues until the global model achieves satisfactory accuracy.
# '''Local Training''': Devices independently train the model using local data.
# '''Aggregation''': Updated models from devices are combined centrally to form an improved global model.
 
This cycle repeats until the model achieves desired accuracy.


==== Why FL for Edge Computing? ====
==== Why FL for Edge Computing? ====
FL effectively addresses limitations of traditional cloud-based machine learning:
FL addresses significant challenges of centralized machine learning:
* Enhances '''data privacy''' by keeping raw data localized.
* Preserves '''data privacy''' as local data stays on devices.
* '''Reduces bandwidth usage''' through sharing only small model updates.
* '''Reduces bandwidth usage''' by transmitting only small updates.
* '''Lowers latency''' as data processing happens locally<ref>Abreha et al., 2022</ref>.
* '''Minimizes latency''' through local data processing.<ref name="Abreha2022"/>


=== 3. Architectures and Techniques for Edge-Based FL ===
=== 3. Architectures and Techniques for Edge-Based FL ===


==== FL Architectures ====
==== FL Architectures ====
FL architectures vary based on aggregation methods<ref>Abreha et al., 2022</ref>:
Key FL architectures include:<ref name="Abreha2022"/>
* '''Centralized FL''': A central server coordinates model aggregation (common but can be a bottleneck).
* '''Centralized FL''': Central server manages aggregation (simple but potentially a bottleneck).
* '''Decentralized FL''': Devices communicate directly (peer-to-peer), enhancing resilience.
* '''Decentralized FL''': Devices communicate directly, enhancing fault tolerance.
* '''Hierarchical FL''': Combines centralized and decentralized methods, using multi-layer aggregation (device-edge-cloud).
* '''Hierarchical FL''': Combines both centralized and decentralized methods with multiple aggregation layers.


==== Aggregation Techniques ====
==== Aggregation Techniques ====
Common aggregation strategies include:
Common aggregation strategies are:<ref name="Abreha2022"/>
* '''Federated Averaging (FedAvg)''': Averages models from devices; ideal for balanced data.
* '''Federated Averaging (FedAvg)''': Basic averaging suitable for balanced data.
* '''Federated Proximal (FedProx)''': Adds regularization to handle diverse data distributions.
* '''Federated Proximal (FedProx)''': Stabilizes training across diverse data distributions.
* '''Federated Optimization (FedOpt)''': Advanced optimizers (FedAdam, FedYogi) speed convergence<ref>Abreha et al., 2022</ref>.
* '''Federated Optimization (FedOpt)''': Uses advanced optimizers (FedAdam, FedYogi) to accelerate convergence.


==== Communication Efficiency ====
==== Communication Efficiency ====
Bandwidth constraints at the edge require efficiency:
Bandwidth-efficient methods include quantization (compressing updates) and sparsification (transmitting minimal updates), significantly reducing communication demands.<ref name="Li2020">Li, T., Sahu, A.K., Talwalkar, A., & Smith, V. (2020). Federated Learning: Challenges, Methods, and Future Directions. ''IEEE Signal Processing Magazine'', 37(3), 50–60.</ref>
* '''Quantization''': Compresses model updates.
* '''Sparsification''': Transmits only essential updates, significantly reducing communication overhead<ref>Li et al., 2020</ref>.


{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable"
|+'''FL vs. Traditional ML: Key Differences'''
|+'''Comparison of Federated Learning and Traditional ML'''
! Feature !! Federated Learning !! Traditional Learning
! Feature !! Federated Learning !! Traditional Learning
|-
|-
| Data Privacy || High (data localized) || Low (centralized)
| Privacy || High (data stays local) || Low (centralized data sharing)
|-
|-
| Bandwidth Usage || Low (small updates) || High (full data transmission)
| Bandwidth Usage || Low (small updates) || High (large data transfers)
|-
|-
| Latency || Low (local processing) || High (cloud communication)
| Latency || Low (local processing) || High (cloud-based)
|-
|-
| Autonomy || High (local decision-making) || Low (cloud-dependent)
| Autonomy || High (local decisions) || Low (cloud-dependent)
|}
|}


=== 4. Privacy, Security, and Resource Optimization in FL ===
=== 4. Privacy, Security, and Resource Optimization ===


==== Privacy-Preserving Mechanisms ====
==== Privacy-Preserving Mechanisms ====
Key privacy techniques in FL include:
To enhance privacy, FL employs:
* '''Differential Privacy''': Adds noise to prevent identifying individual contributions.
* '''Differential Privacy''': Adding noise to protect individual data.
* '''Secure Aggregation''': Combines encrypted updates securely.
* '''Secure Aggregation''': Aggregating encrypted updates without exposing individual contributions.
* '''Homomorphic Encryption''': Enables calculations on encrypted data<ref>Kairouz et al., 2019</ref>.
* '''Homomorphic Encryption''': Computation directly on encrypted data.<ref name="Kairouz2019">Kairouz, P., et al. (2019). Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learning. ''arXiv preprint arXiv:1912.04977''.</ref>


==== Resource-Efficient FL ====
==== Resource-Efficient FL ====
Resource-constrained edge devices require special optimization:
Edge devices are often resource-constrained; thus, FL uses:
* '''Model Compression''': Uses quantization/pruning to minimize storage and computation.
* '''Model Compression''': Reducing model size via quantization and pruning.
* '''Hardware-Aware Training''': Adjusts training based on device capabilities.
* '''Hardware-Aware Training''': Adjusting training based on device computational capacity.


==== Data Heterogeneity Handling ====
==== Data Heterogeneity Handling ====
Methods to manage non-uniform data distributions include:
Non-uniform local data distributions are handled by:<ref name="Li2020"/>
* '''Personalized FL''': Models tailored to individual device data.
* '''Personalized FL''': Tailored models to individual devices.
* '''Clustered FL''': Groups devices by data similarity for better specialized model training<ref>Li et al., 2020</ref>.
* '''Clustered FL''': Grouping similar data profiles to enhance model relevance.


=== 5. Real-World Applications ===
=== 5. Real-World Applications ===
FL demonstrates significant value in various domains:
FL is highly effective in several practical applications:<ref name="Abreha2022"/><ref name="Kairouz2019"/>
 
* '''Healthcare''': Collaborative medical diagnosis models without data-sharing risks.
* '''Healthcare''': Hospitals collaboratively train AI for diagnostics without compromising patient data privacy<ref>Abreha et al., 2022</ref>.
* '''Autonomous Vehicles''': Enhancing driving AI without sharing sensitive data.
* '''Autonomous Vehicles''': Collaborative AI training for enhanced safety without sharing sensitive vehicle data.
* '''Industrial IoT''': Localized predictive maintenance and quality control.
* '''Industrial IoT''': Predictive maintenance, fault detection, and quality control using localized data.
* '''Smart Cities''': Privacy-preserving analytics for traffic and infrastructure management.
* '''Smart Cities''': Distributed analytics for traffic and environmental management while preserving citizen privacy<ref>Kairouz et al., 2019</ref>.


=== 6. Challenges and Open Research Directions ===
=== 6. Challenges and Open Research Directions ===
 
Critical open challenges in FL include:<ref name="Li2020"/>
Despite its advantages, several challenges remain:
* '''Scalability''': Managing numerous devices with limited resources and unreliable connectivity.
 
* '''Security and Trust''': Protecting against malicious attacks like data poisoning.
* '''Scalability''': Efficiently managing thousands or millions of edge devices is complex due to varying resources.
* '''Interoperability''': Developing standards to integrate diverse devices seamlessly.
* '''Security and Trust''': FL models are vulnerable to attacks such as data poisoning and inference threats.
* '''Participation Incentives''': Effective strategies for encouraging honest device contributions.
* '''Interoperability''': Integration across diverse platforms requires standardized protocols and frameworks.
* '''Incentives for Participation''': Motivating devices to contribute honestly requires effective reward mechanisms<ref>Li et al., 2020</ref>.


=== 7. Conclusion ===
=== 7. Conclusion ===
Federated Learning is crucial for advancing Edge Computing by providing a scalable, privacy-preserving method to enable distributed intelligence. Addressing current challenges—particularly scalability, security, and interoperability—is critical for broader adoption and robust edge solutions in the future<ref>Abreha et al., 2022</ref>.
Federated Learning significantly advances Edge Computing by providing decentralized intelligence and privacy protection. Addressing scalability, security, and interoperability challenges remains essential for widespread adoption.<ref name="Abreha2022"/>
 
=== References ===
<references>
<ref>Abreha, H.G., Hayajneh, M., & Serhani, M.A. (2022). Federated Learning in Edge Computing: A Systematic Survey. ''Sensors'', 22(2), 450.</ref>
 
<ref>Kairouz, P., et al. (2019). Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learning. ''arXiv preprint arXiv:1912.04977''.</ref>


<ref>Li, T., Sahu, A.K., Talwalkar, A., & Smith, V. (2020). Federated Learning: Challenges, Methods, and Future Directions. ''IEEE Signal Processing Magazine'', 37(3), 50–60.</ref>
== References ==
</references>
<references/>

Revision as of 22:36, 1 April 2025

Federated Learning in Edge Computing

1. Introduction

Federated Learning (FL) is a distributed machine learning technique where multiple edge devices collaboratively train a shared model while keeping their local data private. It naturally integrates with Edge Computing (EC), which processes data close to the source, reducing latency and enhancing privacy.<ref name="Abreha2022">Abreha, H.G., Hayajneh, M., & Serhani, M.A. (2022). Federated Learning in Edge Computing: A Systematic Survey. Sensors, 22(2), 450.</ref>

2. Fundamentals of Federated Learning at the Edge

How FL Works

Federated Learning operates in three core stages:<ref name="Abreha2022"/>

  1. Task Initialization: A server selects edge devices and distributes the global model.
  2. Local Training: Devices train the model locally using their own data.
  3. Aggregation: The server aggregates device models to update the global model.

This iterative process continues until the global model achieves satisfactory accuracy.

Why FL for Edge Computing?

FL addresses significant challenges of centralized machine learning:

  • Preserves data privacy as local data stays on devices.
  • Reduces bandwidth usage by transmitting only small updates.
  • Minimizes latency through local data processing.<ref name="Abreha2022"/>

3. Architectures and Techniques for Edge-Based FL

FL Architectures

Key FL architectures include:<ref name="Abreha2022"/>

  • Centralized FL: Central server manages aggregation (simple but potentially a bottleneck).
  • Decentralized FL: Devices communicate directly, enhancing fault tolerance.
  • Hierarchical FL: Combines both centralized and decentralized methods with multiple aggregation layers.

Aggregation Techniques

Common aggregation strategies are:<ref name="Abreha2022"/>

  • Federated Averaging (FedAvg): Basic averaging suitable for balanced data.
  • Federated Proximal (FedProx): Stabilizes training across diverse data distributions.
  • Federated Optimization (FedOpt): Uses advanced optimizers (FedAdam, FedYogi) to accelerate convergence.

Communication Efficiency

Bandwidth-efficient methods include quantization (compressing updates) and sparsification (transmitting minimal updates), significantly reducing communication demands.<ref name="Li2020">Li, T., Sahu, A.K., Talwalkar, A., & Smith, V. (2020). Federated Learning: Challenges, Methods, and Future Directions. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 37(3), 50–60.</ref>

Comparison of Federated Learning and Traditional ML
Feature Federated Learning Traditional Learning
Privacy High (data stays local) Low (centralized data sharing)
Bandwidth Usage Low (small updates) High (large data transfers)
Latency Low (local processing) High (cloud-based)
Autonomy High (local decisions) Low (cloud-dependent)

4. Privacy, Security, and Resource Optimization

Privacy-Preserving Mechanisms

To enhance privacy, FL employs:

  • Differential Privacy: Adding noise to protect individual data.
  • Secure Aggregation: Aggregating encrypted updates without exposing individual contributions.
  • Homomorphic Encryption: Computation directly on encrypted data.<ref name="Kairouz2019">Kairouz, P., et al. (2019). Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1912.04977.</ref>

Resource-Efficient FL

Edge devices are often resource-constrained; thus, FL uses:

  • Model Compression: Reducing model size via quantization and pruning.
  • Hardware-Aware Training: Adjusting training based on device computational capacity.

Data Heterogeneity Handling

Non-uniform local data distributions are handled by:<ref name="Li2020"/>

  • Personalized FL: Tailored models to individual devices.
  • Clustered FL: Grouping similar data profiles to enhance model relevance.

5. Real-World Applications

FL is highly effective in several practical applications:<ref name="Abreha2022"/><ref name="Kairouz2019"/>

  • Healthcare: Collaborative medical diagnosis models without data-sharing risks.
  • Autonomous Vehicles: Enhancing driving AI without sharing sensitive data.
  • Industrial IoT: Localized predictive maintenance and quality control.
  • Smart Cities: Privacy-preserving analytics for traffic and infrastructure management.

6. Challenges and Open Research Directions

Critical open challenges in FL include:<ref name="Li2020"/>

  • Scalability: Managing numerous devices with limited resources and unreliable connectivity.
  • Security and Trust: Protecting against malicious attacks like data poisoning.
  • Interoperability: Developing standards to integrate diverse devices seamlessly.
  • Participation Incentives: Effective strategies for encouraging honest device contributions.

7. Conclusion

Federated Learning significantly advances Edge Computing by providing decentralized intelligence and privacy protection. Addressing scalability, security, and interoperability challenges remains essential for widespread adoption.<ref name="Abreha2022"/>

References

<references/>